Archive for March, 2010

Dissent is the Highest Form of Patriotism…..

No Comments »

…..Or that’s what the left used to say when George W. Bush was president. And, you know what? They were right. Dissent is still the highest form of patriotism. However, now that the Democrats are in power, they aren’t such big fans of dissent anymore—in fact, they’ve been doing everything in their power to quash dissent for the last year and a half. Furthermore, if you disagree with President Obama in any way, you are now officially a “RAAAAACIST!” (that’s spelled with five A’s). Want proof? Well, here goes….

I’m sure you all heard about the brouhaha that occurred during the past week. I’m, of course, talking about how a bunch of supposed evil, raaaaacist Tea Partiers attacked some members of the Congressional Black Caucus with racial slurs and how one was even spat upon. You couldn’t have missed it, because the media ran wild with this story, and there were op-eds galore—like this one from Colbert King comparing the Tea Party members to George Wallace, David Duke and the KKK, or this one from Derrick Jackson stating that the Tea Party uses hatred as a political strategy. Oh, and of course Frank Rich has a new column out where he states that all opposition to Obamacare is completely rooted in race hatred. Rich further states in his column that there was “nothing entertaining about watching goons hurl venomous slurs at congressmen like the civil rights hero John Lewis and the openly gay Barney Frank.” So, since the MSM seems so lathered up in self-righteous outrage over these supposed incidents, they must be true, right?

Well, Andrew Breitbart has written an excellent column where he calls all of these incidents into question. Below are some excerpts from Breitbart’s column and two videos of the actual event—-

As I have said over and over and over, the left has one trick that it will use again and again when its back is in the corner: shout ‘racist’ in a crowded country.

On Saturday, during the peaceful and patriotic tea party protest at the Capitol, the Democrats staged a series of symbolic acts meant to manipulate the media to do its bidding. The Congressional Black Caucus pulled the Selma card and chose to walk through the crowd in the hopes of creating a YouTube incident. This is what it looked like:

And this:

Saturday’s “never mind” moment will live in infamy as the Congressional Black Caucus claimed the N-word was hurled 15 times. YouTube video shows that at least two of the men in the procession were carrying video cameras and holding them above the crowd. They have not come forth with evidence to show that even one person hurled the vile racist epithet. The video also shows no head movement one way or another. Wouldn’t the N-word provoke a head turn or two? Is it really possible that in 2010, in a crowd of 30 or 40 thousand people — at the center of a once-in-a-lifetime media circus — not one person’s flipphone, Blackberry, video recorder or a network feed caught a single incident? And if not, then at least someone could have found an honest tea partier to act as an eyewitness — or the Congressional Black Caucus would have confronted the culprit(s). If that had happened, there would be an investigation to see if the perpetrator was a left-wing plant.

That’s how much the Democrats need a racist Tea Party moment. To stop it in its tracks. That’s why on Saturday they used the Congressional Black Caucus to try to manufacture the false appearance of one. And when they didn’t get it, they did what they always do: they lied.

[After watching that footage, I’m beginning to think that Frank Rich might need to be heavily medicated because he claimed that he “watched goons hurl venomous slurs at John Lewis and Barny Frank". I saw nothing of the sort in that footage, so Rich obviously suffers from frequent hallucinations, but I digress.]

Breitbart also reminds us how members of the MSM have willingly participated in similar hoaxes in the past—specifically MSNBC cutting off a Tea Party protester’s head in a shot, who was carrying a gun to a protest, in order to hide the fact that he was black.

But hey, none of those members of the CBC making those allegations have any past history of race-baiting. Oh, wait a minute. I forgot about John Lewis comparing John McCain to George Wallace. (You can watch John McCain’s impassioned response to John Lewis below.)

Oh, and I forgot about Jesse Jackson Jr. (one of the members of the CBC holding a camera while walking through the crowd) stating that Hillary Clinton “cried for her appearance, but not for Katrina victims”. (Wow, race-bating and sexism all rolled into one—you stay classy Mr. Jackson.)

And, who could forget James Clyburn making a huge deal out of Bill Clinton stating that it’s a “fairy tale” that Obama was ever going to pull the troops immediately out of Iraq, and insinuating that Clinton was speaking in some kind of racial code. (Last time I checked, we were still in Iraq, so I guess Mr. Clinton was right.) In fact, Clyburn even went to far as to tell President Clinton to “Chill”.

Well, Bill Clinton sure hasn’t forgotten about Clyburn’s accusations, because he basically admitted to Kate Snow that Clyburn played the race card on him (see embed below).

So, if these fine, upstanding gentlemen (my voice is dripping with sarcasm right now) would go so far as to play the race card on a president of their own party, compare a war hero to George Wallace, and imply that Hillary Clinton doesn’t care if black people in New Orleans drown, then do you really think that they’d have ANY compunction when it comes to lying about a bunch of nameless, faceless protesters?! I seriously doubt it.

Last summer during the town hall meetings, Jonah Goldberg observed the tendency for Obama supporters to be the boy who cried race in an excellent column that he wrote titled, “A Deck Stacked with Race Cards”. Here are some excerpts below—

No one should be surprised. Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, liberal Democrats have to accuse their opponents of racism. Indeed, somewhat to their credit, fighting racism — alas, even where it doesn’t exist — is one of the reasons they became liberal Democrats in the first place.

From Day 1, Obama’s supporters have tirelessly cultivated the idea that anything inconvenient for the first black president just might be terribly, terribly racist.

This was always the nasty side of Obama’s implied hope for unity. Obama gave oxygen to the idea that disagreement with him amounted to obstructing his mission to “transcend race.” During the campaign, that meant anyone who got in his way was wittingly or unwittingly abetting racism (just ask Bill Clinton).

Anyway, the reason why the recent circus involving the CBC is so important is because Obama’s supporters, the DNC and the MSM (I know—they’re all one in the same) have used the race card, name-calling and every other dirty trick in the book in order to suppress dissent. Want proof? Well, here goes….

Here is Maureen Dowd implying that anyone who vocally disagrees with Obama is a “RAAAAAACIST!”. (I guess Jonah Goldberg was right). Here is NYT’s columnist Charles Blow calling the town hall protesters a bunch of “hooligans” who are “hooting and hollering” and “terrorizing legislators”, and then stating that “the Republican Party is no party of Einsteins”. And, here is a recent column from WaPo columnist Courtland Milloy in which he writes the following about the Tea Party protesters (H/T KOTM—his diary is excellent)—

I know how the “tea party” people feel, the anger, venom and bile that many of them showed during the recent House vote on health-care reform. I know because I want to spit on them, take one of their “Obama Plan White Slavery” signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads.

Oh, and how could anyone forget about the infamous and embarrassing DNC video that refers to concerned citizens as “The Mob” ? (Even Camille Paglia derided them for this idiocy.)

Hey, where‘s the love? I thought that being a community organizer was cool. Oh, but silly me. I guess it‘s only cool to organize the community and protest if you are an ACORN member threatening banks. I guess if you are protesting against The One, you are no longer a “community organizer“–you are a “hooligan“ or a member of an “angry mob” and you must be stopped.

Oh, and who could forget Barbara “Ma’am” Boxer calling protesters at the town halls “astroturfers“, because they are “too well dressed“? Our own Lori Ziganto wrote an excellent diary detailing this (and it contains the embed of the video of Barbara Boxer), but I feel the need to paste one of the more hilarious quotes below–

Unlike Cindy Sheehan and her Code Pink cohorts, normal citizens actually attempt to look nice when, you know, going out in public. Even worse, we Right-Wing nutty nut women gasp shave our legs .. while showering no less.. AND wear bras. Sometimes we even comb our hair and put on make-up to look purty. It’s our Stockholm Syndrome, of course. We can’t help objectifying ourselves, obviously.

However, no mocking and deriding of the town hall/Tea Party protesters would be complete without the MSM routinely referring to us as “Teabaggers”. (In case any of you are wondering, the term “Teabagging” is a vile oral sex term.) I have embedded two videos below. The first one shows Anderson Cooper making the disgusting pun, “It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging”. The second one shows Rachel Maddow and Ana Marie Cox laughing for a good seven minutes about “teabaggers”.

OK–please allow me to quickly put this into perspective for you. Can you imagine, for a moment, if conservative commentators were routinely referring to anti-war protesters or pro-Obamacare advocates as “C**kgobblers” (sorry for the vulgarity, but I was trying to make a point)? (Thank you Office Space.) I bet that liberals would be rioting in the streets, but I digress.

And finally, any diary about liberal suppression of dissent would not be complete without the example of Speaker Nancy Pelosi calling people “astroturfers” who attend town halls, and implying that they are Nazis by claiming that “they wear Swastikas” (the video is below).

However, what’s really funny about all of this, is that back in 2006, a bunch anti-war protesters heckled Speaker Pelosi at one of her own town halls, and she told them that their “advocacy is very American” and that she was “a fan of disruptors” (instead of referring to them as a bunch of teabagging, raaaaacist, Nazi hooligans).

However, last August, Speaker Pelosi and Steny Hoyer wrote an op-ed for USA Today where they referred to the town hall protesters as “un-American disruptors!” Hypocrisy much, Madame Speaker?

So now, given the lack of respect—as well as the outright intense animosity—clearly shown towards the town hall/Tea Partiers by the DNC and the MSM, I completely agree with Andrew Breitbart when he writes the following—

It’s time for the allegedly pristine character of Rep. John Lewis to put up or shut up. Therefore, I am offering $10,000 of my own money to provide hard evidence that the N- word was hurled at him not 15 times, as his colleague reported, but just once. Surely one of those two cameras wielded by members of his entourage will prove his point.

And surely if those cameras did not capture such abhorrence, then someone from the mainstream media — those who printed and broadcast his assertions without any reasonable questioning or investigation — must themselves surely have it on camera. Of course we already know they don’t. If they did, you’d have seen it by now.

THOUSANDS OF TIMES.

In other words, if you believe that ANY footage verifying the CBC’s accusations actually exists, but for some reason the MSM isn’t running it, then I have a blind bird dog and some under-water real-estate to sell you.

Oh, and speaking of liberal suppression of dissent, today the WSJ reported that a bunch of Harry Reid supporters surrounded Andrew Breitbart and threw eggs at him, as well as the Tea Party Express bus. And yet, it’s those “violent teabaggers” that we are supposed to fear. Funny, huh?

Well, since I’ve clearly demonstrated how liberals love to suppress dissenting views, I would, now, like to show how “radical” liberals can get when they protest—and boy do they like to protest. Liberals are all for freedom of speech—as long as it’s their freedom of speech, of course.

Here is a video of Code Pink interrupting John McCain’s acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention. I don’t remember any “teabaggers” interrupting Obama’s Speech, do you?

Oh, and here is a NYT’s column about a bunch of spoiled, bratty college kids at The New School turning their backs on john McCain and calling him a “war criminal” when he spoke at their graduation.

Furthermore, speaking of an “angry mob”, do any of you remember when Code Pink members, dressed up like transvestites at Mardi Gras (not that there’s anything wrong with that if you are a transvestite at Mardi Gras–there’s a time and a place for everything), and interrupted General David Petraeus’ confirmation hearing by screaming like banshees? These people could definitely teach the people attending health care town halls and tea parties a thing or two.

Oh, and while we’re on the subject of “hooligans”, what about the video below of members of The New Black Panther Party engaging in clear-cut voter intimidation? By the way, Obama’s Department of Justice dropped the charges against these hooligans after the DoJ had already won. Ed Morrisey of Hot Air has the story (even the US Commission on Civil Rights was furious).

Just a thought, but do any of you really think that Obama’s DoJ would have dropped the charges against two Bubbas in Mississippi dressed in overalls and carrying baseball bats outside of a voting precinct (instead of wearing jackboots and carrying nightsticks)? I highly doubt it (and rightfully so I might add).

Oh, and here is a video of some liberal hooligans throwing a pie at Ann Coulter. I guess, in their world, throwing pies and eggs at people is OK, but waving flags is dangerous.

And finally, there’s this recent video of SEIU union thugs attacking an African-American conservative for exercising his freedom of speech by passing out flags that said “Don’t Tread on Me” (which shows a rattlesnake that was a favorite motto of Benjamin Franklin). The video also shows these “hooligans” “hooting and hollering” and then slapping the woman holding the camera in the face (H/T Caleb Howe).

On a side note, what I find to be very strange, is that what upsets liberals is so very different than what upsets the rest of us. They are bothered more by people protesting at town halls than they are by men with nightsticks threatening voters. They are bothered more by people waving “Don’t Tread on Me” flags than by thugs beating up a guy handing out those very flags. And finally, liberals are angered more by people hurling imaginary slurs at congressmen than by people throwing actual Oreo cookies at Michael Steele, or by people shooting up Eric Cantor’s office (please read Amy Miller’s excellent diary) and posting death threats to him on You Tube (the FBI arrested that man today).

OK—Now that my curiosity is peaked, I thought that I would actually take a look at that infamous Tea Party rally on March 20’th where Congressional Black Caucus members were supposedly smeared.

Oh my eyes!! My eyes!! It burns, it stings!!! That was absolutely terrifying! They were waving flags—and singing The Star Spangled Banner! How will I ever get those awful images out of my head?! It would have been so much more reassuring if they were waving nightsticks, throwing food and slapping people.

However, if you really want to scare a liberal, show up with a baby. Babies are like Kryptonite to them (just ask Sarah Palin whose baby and pregnant daughter were perpetually smeared by the Daily Kos and the MSM). Below is a video of CNN’s Susan Roesgen freaking out on a guy at a Tea Party with a baby and berating the other protesters there. Roesgen says to the man in an accusatory tone, “You are here with your two year old”—like the man had committed some kind of sin by bringing his baby with him.

However, Ms. Roesgen took a COMPLETELY different tone with some anti-war protesters that she interviewed earlier in the year. Bias much, CNN?

OK—altogether now, say it with me—

“Babies and flags and Franklin—Oh my!!”

“Babies and flags and Franklin—Oh my!!”

“Babies and flags and Franklin—Oh my!!”

So, in conclusion, I think that what the DNC, the liberal MSM and the Congressional Black Caucus have been doing is utterly contemptible—simply put, they have been suppressing dissent by making people afraid to speak up. How have they been scaring people you ask? Simple. People have seen other people being regularly mocked by the media, the Speaker of the House, the DNC and other people in power, and naturally they become afraid to protest or speak their minds for fear of being smeared as a “raaaaacist teabagger”—or even of possibly being physically assaulted or losing their job. Just ask the guys over at The Hillbuzz. As our own Finrod thoroughly documented, The Daily Kos and The Democratic Underground have outed Kevin DuJan as the owner of the blog and are smearing him with the false charge that that he is a racist. They are even urging their readers to destroy his career and attack him physically—simply because his blog supported Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary and John McCain in the general election.

I, personally, am against Obamacare because I have a chronic illness (chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuopathy), and am worried about healthcare rationing, overall decreased quality of care, and access to medical tests. I have written extensively about my illness in this diary here. I am also against Obamacare, because I am worried about the national debt, because the WSJ has reported that retirees benefits are already being cut, and because of what a disaster socialized medicine has turned out to be in England (see embed below).

However, even with all of my completely logical reasons for being against Obamacare, I have still been loathe to speak up in certain circles for fear of being labeled a “teabagging, redneck raaaaacist”. Well, NO MORE!! I refuse to be intimidated any longer. Our Founding Fathers, literally, laid down their lives for our first amendment rights. They told the British, in the words of William Wallace, “You may take our lives, but you will never take our freedom!!” Dammit, it’s my right, and the right of every American, to peacefully assemble and protest without feeling threatened in any way—anything less is un-American.

PS—To all of our liberal lurkers out there, if I happen to run into any of you at a protest in the future—and you are advocating for Obamacare—feel free to say “Hi” to me. I will not throw food at you, slap you, wave batons at you, call you vulgar names, or yell at you and your baby. I will simply say “Hi” in return and wish you well. Why? Because our Founding also fought for your first amendment rights as well and so, therefore, it is only right that I treat you and your opinions with respect—even if I vehemently disagree with you. Always remember that dissent—nay—defending someone else’s right to dissent is the highest form of patriotism.

This diary was originally posted on The Minority Report.


The lying Stupak-istic face of Democrats and Barack

2 Comments »

“Figures often beguile me,” wrote Mark Twain, “particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.’”

Twain, meet Cockstradamus

Lies, Dem lies and Stupak-istics

With his March Madness bracket decidedly intact (four teams still alive with only six of the Elite Eight remaining) even after President Barack Obama’s Bluegrass choice fell in a battle of bitter clingers, Cockstradamus weighs in on pre-2010 vernal equinox prognostications from Augusta, Georgia to blue-face lying Jack Asses in Washington, D.C.

We told you during Tiger’s post-prolific coital, winter hibernation in the woods, what happens every Spring. Braves Play Ball! and Eldrick makes The Masters.

We told you before the last autumnal equinox  concerning so-called pro-life Blue Dawg Dem-o-bats and Donkey-cons concerning ObamaCare (and for the last ten years concerning the coincidence of prevarications and the moving lips of leaders of the world’s oldest political party), that the abortion issue would end up being the tipping point excuse for closet-leftist Democrats to betray their constituents’ pursuit of health care happiness.

We feared, when the ObamaCare debate was engaged last summer, that many of the so-called fiscal conservative and/or pro-life Blue Dog Democrats would cave on their initial politically-correct, meant for public consumption, objections to the deficit projections of the health care bills and the allowance for tax dollars to fund abortions or insurance premiums on policies that cover abortions.

Given our discovery many years ago that many of their drawls (and that’s all) was the only “moderate” thing about most Democrats that pretend not to follow the far left leadership of their party. After all, only a handful of Democrats had voted against Obama’s government growthulus (non-stimulus) bill and currency-threatening budgets.

True to form, the tax collectors for the welfare state dropped objections to health care reform bills when they were written vague enough to get a CBO non-blessing that assumes as true what bills say in print.

Even more true to form, elected Democrats that choose to empower the Left by being Democrats in the first place to support an Obama that opposes mandating the Hippocratic Oath apply to babies that survive attempted abortions and escape the womb onto Planet Earth proper and to elect Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, pretend that Executive Orders can veto laws they pass!

Even more telling is that the Bart Stupak’s (D-CA) pretend that anyone in America is not getting an abortion because the federal government isn’t ponying up a few hundred dollars for the procedure. Making a show of the puny abortion issue in the health care bill while empowering Obama to have carte blanche in appointing more Justices to the Supreme Court that will continue the slaughter is the ultimate insult of these serial liars against the voters they view as a necessary nuisance in their quest to control every aspect of the lives that make it through the 9-month right to choose gauntlet they prefer, lest they not be able to make the BMW payments due to the high cost of pampers.

Never rely on Democrats to do the right thing

Never! At least not since Oswald’s bullet found its mark over 26 years ago.

Cockstradamus is hopeful that Americans raised a nation of grandparents that trusted Democrats as the default position, will finally end the analysis at the letter after the candidate’s name, rather than the braying of the donkeys bearing the “D”. In the end, the 34 Democrats that voted against ObamaCare are just as responsible for this disaster, because by giving their party the huge majorities, they empowered the far left.

The only Democrat that properly redeemed himself was Alabama’s Parker Griffith. He chose to change parties and join the GOP minority!

Vote GOP “R” and repeal it!

Its time that we bitterly cling God, guns and the Elephant for a century, while maintaining antipathy for others that betrayed the Hmong in Vietnam, black folks wishing to get off welfare, slaves in the USSR, and the big “L” in Liberty here at home.

March Madness

Obama’s San Francisco, secret mike confession of his bigoted stereotypes to explain why Democrat primary voters in Appalachia chose Hillary over him, gave way to cold calculations last week as Dumbo went out on a limb and crowned bitter clinging Wildcats to win the NCAA Basketball tournament.

That Kentucky cat fell off West Virginia’s mountain last night, as they clung to gunning the ball in the hope. Rocky Top clingers close to God in Tennessee also remain in the final Six.

But unless ObamaCare is thrown off, the only things us hillbillies will have to cling to is God, pictures of guns, antipathy to Obama equines, unemployment compensation, wealth-spreading, pitchforks sicked on profit-makers, food stamps, hope and the little change left in our pockets.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Originally published @ Examiner.com, where all verification links may be accessed.


Warren Auld, Republican for Georgia House District 106

No Comments »

Smaller Government, Character and Integrity

Warren Auld for State House website

Warren Auld on Facebook


Quick–Hide the Children, because a Major Smack-Down is about to Ensue.

No Comments »

This morning on ABC’s “This Week”, Obama lackey David Plouffe faced off against Karl Rove in the ongoing health care debate. Ladies and gentlemen, it was vicious—Plouffe didn’t stand a chance against Rove. In fact, Rove ate his lunch—and that’s putting it politely. For every campaign talking point that David Plouffe regurgitated, Karl Rove swung back hard with actual facts, figures, statistics and calculations. Plouffe was basically reduced to a rubble of transparent Obamaisms. Rove must have sensed that he had Plouffe backed into a corner, because he went so far as to demand that Plouffe “stop throwing around epithets and deal with the facts”. I guess the moral of the story is that when all is said and done, pixie dust and unicorn farts are no match for real knowledge, facts and cojones.

PS—I don’t know about you all, but after watching that train-wreck of a debate (for Plouffe anyway), I’m currently having visions of President Obama nervously pacing around the Oval Office and chain smoking while Rham Emanuel is simultaneously uttering creative and never before heard profanities. Have a happy Sunday! :-)

This diary was originally posted on The Minority Report.


The unexceptional, yet American face of Barack

No Comments »

Michael Warren must not be associated with the New Orleans press?

President Michelle Bachelet leaves office Thursday with a chunk of her country in ruins – and her popularity in the clouds.

Despite complaints that aid was slow to reach the hungry and homeless, experts say Chile’s response to one of history’s most powerful earthquakes has been a model for disaster recovery.

At first, the problems were all too obvious: Chile’s navy and emergency preparedness office failed to issue a tsunami warning that might have saved hundreds of lives after the Feb. 27 quake, and Bachelet didn’t order soldiers to impose order in the streets until after looting had spun out of control.

But experts say other smart moves – like insisting that foreign help meet specific needs, quickly patching up roads and having the military handle logistics – made it possible to deliver 12,000 tons of relief in just 10 days.

Maybe one day we can hope that after ObamaDems fundamentally change America, we can live up to Chili’s disaster relief standard, because we all “know” what a poor job Brownie did, right? Wrong.

Bumbling by top disaster-management officials fueled a perception of general inaction, one that was compounded by impassioned news anchors. In fact, the response to Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest–and fastest-rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm’s landfall.

Read the entire, comprehensive Popular Mechanics  analysis of America’s response to the aftermath of Katrina and learn what Chileans and the rest of the world that doesn’t depend on Bush-despising Anderson Coopers knows, i.e. that America is the standard on disaster relief and everything else that matters. Real people care more about food and shelter than network TV shots of Air Force One and news conferences and they know the alternatives they live with that are not America.

The Vice-President acknowledged another ObamaDemPress Bush-bash myth-debunking recently in Iraq when taking credit for the great success there. It seems that the new Abu Ghraib management’s rogue sexual humiliation spree didn’t erase the Iraqi memories of tens of thousands killed by the old management’s wood chippers. These days, Joe Biden doesn’t seem anymore anxious to discuss dividing the Balfour Declaration’s Babylon into threes than he would splitting up Connecticut.

But, just like the bit role of the Gipper in the fall of the Soviet Union, I guess the Republican President that stayed the course and surged had nothing to do with the “inevitable”?

American had done nothing exceptionally well in ObamaDems’ eyes until the 2008 Democratic primaries after all. Thomas Friedman of the New York Times disagrees with them on this exceptionalism matter, but still suffers from a blindness to what motivates dreamers to make exceptional dreams come true in America and abroad. Recently, he rightly suggests that Yemen “needs a revolution” but then suggests that nothing has changed in the Muslim world since the 1979 Iranian revolution:

Visiting Yemen and watching the small band of young reformers there struggle against the forces of separatism, Islamism, autocracy and terrorism, reminded me that the key forces shaping this region today were really set in motion between 1977 and 1979 — and nothing much has changed since. Indeed, one could say Middle East politics today is a struggle between 1977 and 1979 — and 1979 is still winning.

Overthrowing the Soviet Union, the Taliban, al Qaida and Saddam Hussein, while surrounding Iran on three sides counts as “not mush change”? Don’t tell that to those liberated from tyranny in Iraq and Afghanistan and those motivated by their liberated neighbors to take to their Iranian streets to get liberated. Don’t tell that to the Iraqis, Afghans and Pakistanis emboldened by American arms and the absence of brutal despots, to combat the terrorists in their midst.

Back to the Dreamers Tom, and your other column hoping Obama will deliver us from “lean years” after the “70 fat years.” You seem to think it is government that makes dreams come true that enable us to have 70 fat years. It isn’t.

What makes it possible for America to weep over Planes flying over Nawlins while taking the low death toll for granted;fret over the obese “poor”; win cold and hot wars; and liberate the globe is wealth. And how and why is that wealth created by dreamers? Because in America we have unalienable rights from God to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to keep the private property we secure after taking risks that are never taken by dreamers in other nations because the laws don’t secure those rights. In those other countries, the people look to the government to take wealth from others to secure their government-granted right to do what the government says they can do.

That is why it took Standard Oil Americans to show Arabs how to drill for oil.

Exceptionalism costs money, and wealth has to be created before a socialist can spread it around. The last Democrat to understand this was John F Kennedy, which is why his administration is known as Camelot. JFK dreamed of an American on the Moon. But Obama’s Camel-Not cuts NASA because he don’t know Jack!

Lincoln dreamed of our union as the last best hope of man on Earth. ObamaDems’ dream of all Americans paying dues to their union of experts that know best what we should do, and the only dreams are to conjure are those of apology tours, federal-funded abortions and high energy prices to protect climate change scientists from their too hot to handle emails.

ObamaDems despise America so much they threaten to try Justice Department lawyers and CIA interrogators that kept us safe after 911 for war crimes, while letting ACORN pimps and New Black Panther thugs walk. They insist that 911 terrorists get show trials on Broadway, lest any Ivy league professor deem them morally equivalent to Bush while deny a trial for our Constitution they have sentenced to to death.

ObamaDems are waking a sleeping giant with their sneak attack on the fundamental character of Americans right to self government and the rule of law, as surely as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor did.

The rooster announces the dawn of a new day and a new birth of freedom, after the ObamaDem deluge.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Originally published @ Examiner.com, where all verification links may be accessed.


The road to anarchy face of Barack

No Comments »

What our forefathers with so much difficulty secured, do not basely relinquish.” – William Bradford

America has been slouching towards Gomorrah down the road to serfdom since the 1930s, at the latest. But at least most of those miles were slogged with the consent of the governed in Congress, in accordance with the rule of law.

And yet, I wonder if Bork’s and Hayak’s pessimistic prognostications about our slow, voluntary relinquishment of liberty to an all-powerful socialist state could be side-tracked into anarchy by an over-reaching, pitchfork-wielding, Chicago Democrat mob in the White House and suicidal Dem-o-bats in the House willing to consider ”deeming” a non-voted on socialization of health care bill “passed”?

For decades I wondered why citizens should respect the opinions of five black-robed oligarchs as law, when they disrespect a Constitution ratified by super-majorities of We the People. Now I wonder why We the People shouldn’t “deem” King George-like mandates to buy Blue-Cross Shield akin to the tea thrown into Boston Harbor?

It has been hard enough to swallow a Obama-Democratic Party that cares nothing for the poor and middle class seeking jobs and reasonably-priced energy to get one to a job. Its been downright impossible to digest a government-growthulus bill that only stimulated the retention of paper-shuffling bureaucrats and union hacks. Don’t ask my about the hurl on the wall of the ObamaDems’ first two budget deficits of over $1.3 Trillion apiece, that make Bush’s budgets taste like Pepto-Bismol.

But now, after the shouts of “Not no, but Hell no!” from Tea parties, Town Halls, New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts, not only does the Democrat Majority Leader of the Senate considers changing the rules to “reconcile” the end of health care liberty with 50 votes instead of the usual 60, but the Speaker of the House openly considers a proposal from Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) to pass a “rule”  that would “deem” the Senate health care bill passed for delivery to the President to be signed into law, without a vote by the House.

At least the New Deal, Great Society, Fannie Mae, and Rx Drug Bills were enacted with the consent of the governed. Didn’t we throw off a King after a Shot Heard round the World in order to avoid laws “deemed passed” by divine, or non-divine right?

Admittedly, the rule of law had been under assault for decades by judicial fiat and, to a lesser extent, bureaucratic “interpretations” of vague laws passed by timid legislators. Rules of law were surely abused by Paulson’s blank checks and Obama’s threats to turn out the pitchforks on bank executives.

But if Congress just ignores the withdrawn consent of the governed and foists this assault on the right to pursue health happiness upon us, wouldn’t we have arrived at full blown serf status if we didn’t rise up and deem serfdom unacceptable? When Chief Justice Roberts and Juan Williams bemoan a Democrat President and Congress taunting a physically surrounded powerless court, aren’t we seeing the rise of a danger worth smacking down utterly?

The last time a President engaged in such behavior at a State of the Union address was when an over-reaching FDR tried to usurp the rule of law and “pack” the Court with judges that would uphold unconstitutional provisions of the New Deal. FDR suffered huge setbacks in the election just before WWII bailed him out.

Aren’t we conservatives for a reason? For years we have been told that Hitler was right-winger, when, in fact, he led national socialism to power, just as Stalin did international socialism. Both led their flocks to tyranny. Tyrants dictate behavior to subjects. Democrats in the White House and Congress now seek to dictate from the left by overthrowing the rule of law.

On the right, the extreme absence of the rule of law is called anarchy, which I think the ObamaDems are inviting. I, for one, refuse to live as a slave.

At least from anarchy, a liberty-seeking revolution could spring from tea-drinkers. In fact, even a few elected Republicans are showing signs of a pulse that would reject the kind of Karl Rove-timidity that remained silent during the Bushlied Era.

I suspect that if the Democrats impose socialized medicine on the public thru any device, they will not only pay dearly at the ballot box, but will also unleash a backlash, the likes of which this nation has never seen, because this would be the first time (Although we got a glimpse of “experts” born to rule us in 1912, but I digress…) that elected officials in these United States had ever defied the most important lesson of our revolution:

Government by consent of the governed is the only true, legitimate government.

Postscript Note on Roads: Before we get to Gomorrah, serfdom or anarchy, all roads lead to Indianapolis, and Braves-Gamecock celebrates March Madness with a tribute to his academically-acclaimed undergraduate alma mater (Founded 1854) Wofford College (1500 students) of Spartanburg, S.C. and their Terriers’ Southern Conference championship and first ever trip to the Final Four.

Let the Big Dog Eat!

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Originally published @ Examiner.com, where all verification links may be accessed.


The March madness face of Barack, etc

No Comments »

March began with white coated doctors at the White House, unable to reconcile the lies of a rabid socialized-medicine hound, committing malpractice by failing to first do no harm by clothing the big-eared, self-described mutt in a strait jacket.

We hope Sandra Bullock Blind Sides Oscar’s dogs tonight, but Braves-Gamecock hopes the madness continues with his undergraduate alma mater’s Terriers making the Big dance for the first time:

Since moving to Division I in 1995, the Wofford men’s basketball team has never made the NCAA tournament.

But this might be the year.

“I would streak back to Radford if that were to happen,” said Wofford coach Mike Young, a Radford High School graduate.

Young, 47, has steered Wofford (21-8, 13-3 Southern Conference) to its first 20-win season at the Division I level.

“There’s a lot of things to enjoy with a Heineken in hand this spring, but still a lot to accomplish,” said Young, an Emory & Henry graduate.

The winner of Thursday’s game between Wofford and visiting College of Charleston (19-9, 13-3) will clinch the SoCon regular-season title — and an automatic bid to the NIT, should that team not win the automatic NCAA bid that goes to the SoCon tournament champ. Wofford has never been to the NIT, either.

Wofford, a Spartanburg, S.C., school with just 1,439 students, has won eight straight since losing to Bobby Cremins’ College of Charleston squad 70-68 last month.

Wofford’s first win over our law school alma mater’s Gamecocks since 1939 earlier this year defined the regular season.

Last year’s leading Southern Conference  March Madness star now an NBA sensation

I thought Davidson’s Stephen Curry might have been too small to make in the land of giants. Happily, I was wrong

Burning question for April: Will Cockstradamus be right about Tiger at the Masters and baseball happening every Spring. I think so.

We can see the State Capitol from atop the rock MLK memorialized, but what we can’t see and wish we could, are:

Bleeding heart liberal public college professors willing to bleed their fat wallets to ensure that more low income students won’t face tuition hikes due to the Peach State’s massive budget shortfall;

Ethics legislation passed into law that protects us from rotten peaches, despite the lack of recent headlines about lobbyist-legislator incest.; and

Rep. Stephanie Stuckey Benfield’s (D-85) criminal records expengement bill passed into law.

Camel-not’s King doesn’t know Jack

(H/T to Rush Limbaugh’s parody with Bill Clinton as Merlin the Magician suggesting that King Obama and his square pegs’ poor fit at JFK’s Round Table.)

Jack Kennedy wouldn’t have prosecuted Justice Department lawyers and the CIA interrogators they advised for swabbing the nose of 911′s architect; Navy Seals that rubbed the tummy of terrorist muderers; nor read  the BVD-bomber Miranda rights while dismissing charges against ACORN pimps and New Black Panther voter intimidation thugs.

Evan Bayh wouldn’t have felt the need to give up a safe senate seat due to disgust with a JFK-led Democratic Party. One only wishes Bayh had the courage to have waved bye-bye to the blood-sucking vampie of a Dem-o-Bat party rather than bemoaning a supposed “broken” Washington just as We the People were exerting our will to fix D.C.

This all reminds this rooster of H. L. Menchen’s description of the World’s Oldest political party as jackels worshipping jack asses.

Finally, with more hat tips to Rush and Mark Steyn: Want to see a non-strait-jacketed ObamaCare future? See Greece:

While Barack Obama was making his latest pitch for a brand new, even more unsustainable entitlement at the health care “summit,” thousands of Greeks took to the streets to riot. An enterprising cable network might have shown the two scenes on a continuous split-screen – because they’re part of the same story. It’s just that Greece is a little further along in the plot: They’re at the point where the canoe is about to plunge over the falls. America is further upstream and can still pull for shore, but has decided, instead, that what it needs to do is catch up with the Greek canoe. Chapter One (the introduction of unsustainable entitlements) leads eventually to Chapter 20 (total societal collapse): The Greeks are at Chapter 17 or 18.

What’s happening in the developed world today isn’t so very hard to understand: The 20th century Bismarckian welfare state has run out of people to stick it to. In America, the feckless insatiable boobs in Washington, Sacramento, Albany and elsewhere are screwing over our kids and grandkids. In Europe, they’ve reached the next stage in social democratic evolution: There are no kids or grandkids to screw over. The United States has a fertility rate of around 2.1 – or just over two kids per couple. Greece has a fertility rate of about 1.3: 10 grandparents have six kids have four grandkids – i.e., the family tree is upside down. Demographers call 1.3 “lowest-low” fertility – the point from which no society has ever recovered. And, compared with Spain and Italy, Greece has the least-worst fertility rate in Mediterranean Europe.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Originally published @ Examiner.com, where all verification links may be accessed.


Bad Behavior has blocked 775 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Ad Plugin made by Free Wordpress Themes